Monday, April 25, 2016

TOKYO: A PERSONALITY OF ITS OWN




            I love Tokyo. And I must confess: I was skeptical that I would. Two years ago on this trip, we traveled to Osaka, the fourth largest city in Japan, and I didn’t love it. Almost no one spoke English (which I realize is my limitation, not theirs). The city was way crowded. It had little unique personality, as far as I could tell. It seemed like a giant American metropolis with people who are obviously kind but cannot communicate with you.


            Tokyo seems worlds apart from its sister. More people speak English there, though still, far fewer than you would think. I remember being taught in grade school that the Japanese were teaching their children English and Western traditions in an effort to compete with us economically (something they clearly have no trouble doing). But if you’ve never been to Japan, you may be surprised to learn that very few people speak “our” language.

            Tokyo just seems more efficient and more cognizant of what it wants to be than Osaka or, frankly, most American cities. Most of the restaurants and clubs seat just a handful of people. Real estate is precious. But businesses nonetheless flourish. They serve a particular clientele, who keep them busy. Genuine Japanese food can be quite good, though the nation seems to have fallen for America’s crippling love of fried foods. Virtually every restaurant prominently features fried dark-meat chicken, and the fat and skin of the bird typically appear in the nuggets. (I read decades ago that one consequence of the Japanese incorporating some American traditions into their lifestyles was a spike in the incidence of heart ailments. I suspect fried chicken plays a major role in that.

            As one example of this “smaller is better” mentality, we dined at a restaurant near our centrally located hotel called “Sushi Isshin” that is a Michelin-starred restaurant. (Tokyo, by far the largest city on the planet, now has the most Michelin-starred restaurants, exceeding even Paris.) This restaurant had great reviews and was very close by. We were late to dinner (which involves a particular seating because the menu is a prix fixe set of 10 to 20 sushi courses (most of which just involve a single sushi piece). We couldn’t find the place. It turned out being a tiny room in an apartment down an alley that seats only 10 people. You sit around the slicing area and the chef hands you each course from his spot behind the counter immediately after he prepares it. You can’t get fish any fresher than we had it there. The dinner was magnificent! I’m not a huge sushi fan. I like gourmet sushi, though it’s not my favorite dish. I can’t stomach fast food sushi. But the sushi we had at this Tokyo restaurant was the best meal I’ve had on the trip.

            Now, back to this organized, efficient Tokyo lifestyle. Take the gay area of town, for instance. (Now don’t panic, Brother Harry fans. I was there purely to witness. I love witnessing in establishments where only half the congregation is kneeling.) There are, of course, mammoth nightclubs where people dance. But the gay bar section of non-dance clubs literally consists of four blocks on a single street. And yet, there are over 200 bars there. Let me say that again. Over 200 gay bars are situated on four city blocks of a single street. They extend upwards to six stories. Each bar seats only a handful to a dozen people. They are neighborhood bars which obviously feature largely the same clientele all day. Some are actually themed bars. They are much like the handkerchiefs in the 1970s.


Remember those, gay boys? No matter what sexual act you were into, there was a specific handkerchief color and design for you. If you preferred to be the dominant partner in the act, you wore the cloth in your left back pocket. If you liked being the submissive member, you wore it in the right back pocket.


Well, in Tokyo, there is a tiny bar just for people who enjoy your fetish. And someone will ask you when you arrive what precisely you are into. The person may even seat you next to someone who compliments your interest. Just don’t assume they love Western white boys, though. Given the small nature of the bars, I have been told they will sometimes decline to serve Westerners in favor of their regular clientele. Whereas the Japanese in America are often into large white men, the Japanese in Japan appear to be into svelte Japanese men. I’m just reporting what I heard from the locals. I’m too old to turn heads even if the group has a fetish for white men who can’t help but say “y’all” repeatedly, even when in a foreign country.

I spent most of my time in the city just wandering around, speaking to proprietors and customers of various places. At one point, I had a snack at a lesbian restaurant that I didn’t realize was a lesbian restaurant until I entered. It was quite large by Japanese standards and had more male patrons than female patrons. But it doesn’t take long for me to realize when I’m in a G, L, B or T establishment. Perhaps one giveaway was the place’s infatuation with Madonna (meaning it had to feature either lesbians or nelly retro queens). The walls had photos of no one but Madonna, ranging from her younger years to the present. The television played footage from a recent Madonna concert nonstop. I asked the proprietor about this and she said Madonna is loved there, and frankly throughout Japan. I must confess that all the music videos I saw in bars were of American singers and principally of contemporary American divas. This, despite the fact that few of the people watching these videos speak the language being sung.

One final note in the form of a stereotype, if I may. I generally eschew stereotyping, though I’m more willing to do it when the judgment is of a positive nature. The Japanese – at least the folks I encountered in Japan – are thoroughly delightful. When we traveled to Osaka a few years ago, Bill Chalmers, who directs this trek, said we should avoid asking any “yes” or “no” questions, particularly if we were interested in directions. The Japanese cannot say “no.” It’s not in their nature. They want to be helpful and kind and saying something negative, even if merely to tell you your directions are off, is something they’re reluctant to do. (This, of course, contrasts sharply with our own country where we’re willing to unfriend people on Facebook simply for posting a political meme we don’t like.)

            I was a bit surprised by all of this two years ago because a dear friend of mine, Kevin (whose last name I will omit to avoid being sued by him), someone who is as liberal and enlightened as the day is long, hates Japanese tourists. He attributes Japanese tourists to every evil he has encountered when traveling. He says they get in his way with their incessant photo-taking, they push him out of lines and away from art objects, they have disrupted plane flights by trying to get their luggage before the plane reached the gate. He even says he saw a Japanese tourist slicing off part of the Rosetta Stone at the National Museum in London before they put the object under glass. Sorry, Kevin, but I find the Japanese to be charming. Perhaps there is some koolaid the airlines make them drink on the way to Western locales….

As I’ve said before, I view this annual trek as something in the nature of a survey course. You decide where you might return based on a few days in each place on this trip. Tokyo is definitely a place to which I would consider returning.

Sunday, April 17, 2016

MEXICO CITY: DOES BIGGER NECESSARILY MEAN BETTER?
           
This year’s Global Scavenger Hunt has begun! As those of you who follow this blog know, every year (I’m now in my fourth consecutive) we travel to 10 countries in 23 days. Other than the initial and final destinations, we do not know where we’re going, typically, until four hours before we depart for the next locale. So, this year, we started in Mexico City. Yesterday was the first day of “scavenges” – tasks that each two-person team can perform for specified points. The winning team at the end of the trip receives various prizes including a waiver of all fees for the following year’s travel. There are certain mandatory scavenges (generally involving food items because the travel director is very concerned about nutrition—more on that later), bonus scavenges (tasks that involve a lot of points but generally require nearly half a day to complete) and garden variety scavenges (e.g., visiting a certain place and taking a photograph of your partner with the proprietor, taking a swim in a particular river, riding a particular kind of animal, visiting a certain museum or sporting venue, etc.)

I don’t compete. Don’t get me wrong. I love this trip. It’s the highlight of my year. It has to be, otherwise I wouldn’t take it when I have an appellate brief due during the trip along with several other work-related projects I must complete. I view this trip as a “survey course of the world.” Do you remember those classes in high school that were “survey” courses that helped you decide what you wanted to pursue? We had one in which you took six weeks of Spanish, French, German and Latin over the course of your freshman or sophomore year. You then decided which one you liked the most and pursued it. This trip is very much like that. You get a flavor of the culture, people, personalities and beauty of each country you visit, even if you’re only there for a day or two. You can then decide whether to go back to the country. Have I done the latter? Not yet. But I will.

The team destined to win this year has done precisely that. The team consists of Zoe Littlepage and Rainey Booth, known by their clever team name as “Lawyers Without Borders.” They fell in love with India and Nepal, among other countries, on this trip and have been back to visit both places repeatedly. I worked with Zoe and Rainey on litigation that lasted almost a decade and they introduced me to this event. Zoe and Rainey have won the competition countless times. It seems the only impediment to them winning is…well…them. In years in which they have not won, they had an ailing relative attending the event with them, stragglers who wanted to do things that did not involve a lot of points and myriad other issues. And this year, Rainey has already had his passport and other ID stolen (why he was walking around with his passport as a seasoned traveler is beyond me). When they’re determined to win, though, Zoe and Rainey win. And by a huge margin. I looked into their eyes yesterday morning when the trip director handed out the pamphlet of Mexico City scavenges and I could tell they’re determined. Assuming the trip director allows Zoe to compete in the next leg without Rainey (who will have to stay behind to get his passport issue resolved), I think they have this in the bag. I feel a bit sorry for the rest of the field, for they don’t have a snowball’s chance. And they have no idea. They’re going to garner what they view as enormous point totals, only to realize they have been completely outdone.

I wish I could say I love Mexico City, but I don’t. Not as compared to the other wonderful places we have been on this trip in year’s past. Sure, it’s big and has every type of place you could attend. But while it’s long on big, it’s rather short on personality. I got here a day early to explore the places people said you had to visit. I wasn’t impressed. Everyone said we had to go to the downtown post office where everything was gold. It turned out to be a plain vanilla post office where, decades ago, the trim was painted with gold-colored paint which is now peeling off. The fact that so many people recommended such a singularly uninspired location caused me pause right off the bat. I’ve been in a few castles here and seen good views of the city. But merely seeing a vast emptiness does not translate into something substantive. Is the city big? Sure. It’s the 2nd biggest city in the world. Are there lots of skyscrapers? Of course. More than any other major city possesses. Does all this vastness make it special? Well, not in my eyes. I will give the city this. I went to one of the “alternative lifestyle” sections of the city (don’t get angry with me, Brother Harry fans—I was there purely to witness). It was nice seeing guys holding hands and kissing in the open. We often view Mexico as a third world country, which it once was. It is actually quite the enlightened society, truth be told. But it remains poor. Outside each of the bars were numerous workers donning the t-shirt of the bar, begging potential patrons to enter. Once inside, they ordered your drink for you, and you paid them so they got a commission. I got the impression they worked for nothing else.

I had hoped that Mexico City would have some good, genuine, Mexican (not Tex-Mex but authentic Mexican) cuisine. I got none of that. The meals we had, including at restaurants recommended (e.g., Villa Marie), were wholly uninspiring. I just really don’t like this city. Now, bear in mind that I am typically THRILLED by the places we visit, so please do not get turned off by my rather negative review of this locale. Read on in the coming days and see whether the trip achieves different status.

As for the hotels that accompany this excursion – well – they are always fabulous. We’re staying at the St. Regis Mexico City which has every modern convenience imaginable. (I have yet to figure out how to use all the light switches in my room.) In addition to the gorgeous rooms (with incredibly comfortable beds and walk-in showers with lots of water pressure), the buffet breakfast, included in our package, is elaborate and delicious. Now, for that comment I made earlier about the trip director and his commitment to nutrition. Apparently, in the early years of this event, some people saving their money decided not to eat and therefore got sick. So now, the trip includes buffet breakfast at each locale to ensure every participant gets at least one good meal. Clever and compassionate. This shows how concerned Bill and Pamela Chalmers are with making sure everyone has a rewarding experience.

So, we met last night and were told that we would leave this morning for our next location. But Bill won’t reveal that place until we’re all on the bus around 7 a.m. I’ll keep you posted!

Adios.